TaxTips.ca does
not research or endorse any product
or service appearing in
ads on this site.
Before making a major financial decision you
should consult a qualified professional.
Are you an employee or a self-employed independent contractor?
The question of whether a person is in a business
relationship (self-employed independent contractor) or in an employee-employer
relationship is not one that is always easy to
answer. There have been many court cases on this
subject. The courts generally look at the following
criteria in making their decisions:
control - more control is generally exercised by an
employer over an employee than by a client over a
self-employed person
chance of profit/risk of loss - self-employed persons
usually have some degree of financial risk, and more
opportunity for profit than employees
integration - an employee's job will be an integral
part of an employer's business, where the tasks
performed by a self-employed person will likely be
less integrated with the client's business
tools and equipment - self-employed persons are more
likely to be supplying their own tools and equipment, as
well as being responsible for their maintenance
These topics are further explained in the CRA publication
RC4110
Employee
or self-employed. A comprehensive checklist is
also provided in this publication. This checklist is
useful for a worker or a payer (employer/client) to help
determine whether their relationship is a business
relationship or an employer/employee relationship.
CRA also has information on the following categories of
workers to help determine whether they are employees or self employed for
purposes of CPP and EI, in their web page CPP/EI
Explained:
real estate agents
workers who own and operate heavy machinery
workers engaged in construction
workers engaged in fishing
Court cases:
Supreme Court of Canada 671122
Ontario Ltd. vs Sagaz Industries Canada Inc., June 2001
- although this is a vicarious liability case, not a tax
case, it sets out the above criteria in determining the
differences between employee and self-employed person.
Tax Court of Canada Preddie
v. the Queen, March 2004 - appellant was working as
a tutor. The Tax Court determined that he was
self-employed, not an employee.
Tax Court of Canada Woodland
Insurance vs Minister of National Revenue, February 2005
- this is an Employment Insurance and Canada Pension
Plan case, where the Court ruled that Woodland Insurance
was liable for EI and CPP premiums, because the worker
was an employee, not self-employed.
Employee advantages
qualify for employment insurance
Canada Pension Plan premiums paid 50% by employer
participation in employee benefits, including:
vacation pay
provincial medical plan
extended health benefits - medical, dental, vision
care
The information on this site is not intended to be a
substitute for professional advice. Each person's situation differs, and
a professional advisor can assist you in using the information on this web
site to your best advantage.
See our Business
Directory for tax, accounting and finance-related firms in your
area.
Please see our legal
disclaimer regarding the use of information on our site, and our Privacy
Policy regarding information that may be collected from visitors to our
site.